Episode 2: Patel v Barlows  4 WLR 6
31st Mar 2021
Sam Laughton talks about the recent decision in Patel v Barlows  4 WLR 6, in which he successfully argued for the existence of a partnership and a beneficial interest in a Quistclose trust, in relation to a real estate joint venture. HHJ Mithani KC also gave detailed guidance as to the application of the Berkeley Applegate jurisdiction, where trustees in bankruptcy seek to claim their costs of recovering property held on trust for others.
The information and any commentary on the law contained in these podcasts are provided free of charge for information purposes only and do not represent legal or financial advice, and are not intended to be relied upon as such. Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date as at the date it is written, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by Ten Old Square, any of the members of Ten Old Square, its committees or staff. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal or financial advice to any person on a specific case or matter, does not take into account individual circumstances, and may not reflect recent changes in the law. Individuals are strongly advised to obtain specific personal advice from a lawyer about any case or matter they may have and not to rely on the information or comments on this site or on any of the materials made available. Statements of fact and opinions expressed therein are those of the speaker(s) /author(s) individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the collective opinion or position of Ten Old Square, its members, its committees or staff. These materials may be published in this or amended form in various media, including print and on the internet or in audio and/or video formats without further notice.
Samuel Laughton Call 1993