Skip to content

podcasts - By Richard Dew

Season 2, Episode 7: Hirachand v Hirachand [2021] EWCA Civ 1498

24th Nov 2021

CFAs and 1975 Act claims. Hirachand v Hirachand [2021] EWCA Civ 1498. Richard Dew talks about the Court of Appeal decision that permits recovery of CFA uplifts in 1975 Act claims including the implications for both Claimants and Defendants.

Episode 8: Clitheroe v Bond [2021] EWHC 1102 (Ch)

12th May 2021

Richard Dew discusses the recent decision in Clitheroe v Bond, where the High Court considered, on appeal from a decisions of a Deputy Master, (i) whether the test for testamentary capacity is that set out in Banks v Goodfellow or in the Mental Capacity Act 2005 (ii) the nature of delusions sufficient to make a […]

Episode 1: Rokkan v Rokkan [2021] EWHC 481 (Ch)

31st Mar 2021

Richard Dew talks about the decision of Rokkan v Rokkan which considered whether Norwegian laws applied to a Welsh estate and whether a legacy could be adeemed at a time when a testator lacked capacity.

The information and any commentary on the law contained in these podcasts are provided free of charge for information purposes only and do not represent legal or financial advice, and are not intended to be relied upon as such.

Every reasonable effort is made to make the information and commentary accurate and up to date as at the date it is written, but no responsibility for its accuracy and correctness, or for any consequences of relying on it, is assumed by Ten Old Square, any of the members of Ten Old Square, its committees or staff. The information and commentary does not, and is not intended to, amount to legal or financial advice to any person on a specific case or matter, does not take into account individual circumstances, and may not reflect recent changes in the law.

Individuals are strongly advised to obtain specific personal advice from a lawyer about any case or matter they may have and not to rely on the information or comments on this site or on any of the materials made available.

Statements of fact and opinions expressed therein are those of the speaker(s) /author(s) individually and, unless expressly stated to the contrary, are not the collective opinion or position of Ten Old Square, its members, its committees or staff. These materials may be published in this or amended form in various media, including print and on the internet or in audio and/or video formats without further notice.

Barrister Portfolio
Barristers / Name Call CV Email

Remove All

Click here to email this list of barristers to a colleague.